Strategic Management Explorer

The Curiosity Gap: Why Growth Talk Piques Analyst Interest

By John C. Eklund and Michael J. Mannor

Every quarter, a high-stakes drama unfolds in the conference rooms of the world’s largest corporations. Executives step to the microphone to deliver their quarterly earnings calls. Most observers focus on the raw numbers, but a groundbreaking study suggests that the specific way leaders talk about their future strategy can fundamentally change how the market thinks.

In a comprehensive review published in the Strategic Management Journal, researchers John C. Eklund and Michael J. Mannor examined how analysts evaluate and respond to executive communications about firm strategy. Their findings reveal that when leaders focus on growth, they do more than just share data; they trigger a profound cognitive shift in the people who value their companies.

The Practitioner “So What”

Executive “growth talk” acts as a cognitive stimulus that piques analyst curiosity and intensity. However, this only translates to higher stock ratings when it aligns with existing market expectations or is framed carefully to avoid “expectation violations”—particularly for dividend-paying firms.

The Research: Deep Diving into the Analyst’s Mind

John C. Eklund and Michael J. Mannor analyzed a massive sample of firms in the S&P 500 between 2008 and 2023. They used advanced linguistic analysis tools to measure the exact emotional and cognitive tone of both executives and securities analysts. By focusing on the question-and-answer portion of these calls, they were able to see in real time how analysts reacted to different strategic frames. The researchers specifically wanted to see whether discussing growth made analysts more curious or more skeptical, and how that affected the final stock ratings.

Findings

Cognitive Stimulation

The Stimulus of Growth: The study found that executive communication acts as a powerful cognitive stimulus. When senior managers increase their focus on growth strategies, analysts do not just sit back and take notes. Instead, they respond with a measurable increase in curiosity and analytical focus. This is a form of cognitive arousal, where the analyst leans in to bridge the information gap between what the firm is doing now and what it intends to do in the future. This heightened state of interest is not just academic; it is the primary way analysts begin to update their internal mental models of a company.

Evaluation Drivers

The Mediation Effect: One of the most significant discoveries of the research is that these cognitive shifts actually drive the final evaluation. The analyst’s curiosity and analytical intensity partially mediate the positive relationship between growth talk and favourable stock ratings. In other words, the more a manager can make an analyst curious about a growth path, the more likely that analyst is to issue a buy recommendation. Curiosity motivates the analyst to seek more information, often leading to a deeper understanding of the firm’s potential and a higher price forecast.

Inorganic vs. Organic Signals

The Power of Inorganic Strategies: Not all growth talk is created equal. The research found that analysts respond differently to organic growth compared to inorganic growth. Strategies focused on alliances and product innovation tend to spark the most curiosity among analysts. However, when it comes to the actual stock rating, analysts are most moved by inorganic strategies like new market entry and scope expanding mergers and acquisitions. These bold moves provide a clearer and more concrete signal of value that analysts find easier to incorporate into their financial models.

Narrative Conflict

Expectation Violations: The study also highlights a critical warning for leaders. Analyst reactions are heavily shaped by what they already expect from a firm. For companies that are already categorized as strong growth firms, talking more about growth reinforces the existing narrative and leads to higher price forecasts. However, for firms that are known for high dividend yields, the same growth talk can be perceived as a threat. Analysts view this as an expectation violation, because growth typically requires reinvesting cash that would otherwise go back to shareholders. In these cases, the firm is often punished with lower evaluations despite a positive message.

Practical Implications: What Strategic Leaders Should Do

Strategic Communication Roadmap

  • Manage the Conflict: Managers must be incredibly conscious of how their strategic messages conflict with prevailing market perceptions. If you are a dividend paying firm trying to pivot toward growth, you cannot just announce the change. You must carefully reframe the narrative to explain how this new growth will eventually support or enhance the long term value proposition that the analysts already believe in.
  • Align Talk with Action: Analysts are sophisticated consumers of information and look for signs that a manager is sincere. The research found that analysts respond much more positively to growth talk when it is supported by subsequent tangible investments.
  • Prioritize the Q&A: Since analysts are most responsive during the question-and-answer portion of the call, executives should prioritize these interactions. This is the moment where the analyst is most curious and analytical.

Conclusion: The Sophisticated Intermediary

The work of Eklund and Mannor reminds us that analysts are not just number crunchers; they are attentive information intermediaries who thoughtfully reevaluate firms based on the nuances of communication. By understanding the cognitive levers of curiosity and analytical focus, leaders can better influence how the market perceives their future. In the end, the most successful executives are those who do not just report on their strategy, but actively engage the minds of those who judge it.

Published Date
03 April 2026

Reference

Eklund, J. C., & Mannor, M. J. (2026). Curious and analytical: How analysts evaluate and respond to executive communications about firm strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 1-32.

Contributed By
John C. Eklund and Michael J. Mannor

Article Type
Article Summary/Abstract

NEWSLETTER

Sign up to receive updates on the latest research, events, and SMS news.